|
Post by Seventy2 on Dec 18, 2008 14:17:15 GMT -5
IN THE BEGINNING: in the middle: ?!?!?! in the end: after i realized i wasted money on that movie.
|
|
|
Post by Bittenbymonk on Dec 18, 2008 18:39:54 GMT -5
it wasn't bad!
|
|
|
Post by bocaj on Dec 18, 2008 19:56:43 GMT -5
Original was pretty good, new one looks dissapointing.
|
|
|
Post by Seventy2 on Dec 18, 2008 21:18:10 GMT -5
it had the potentiel (sp) to be great, but it ruined that.
|
|
|
Post by Arashi on Dec 19, 2008 1:54:52 GMT -5
I'm not sure if I've seen the original. Let me ask my mum...
|
|
|
Post by Arashi on Dec 19, 2008 2:01:33 GMT -5
I'm not sure if I've seen the original. Let me ask my mum... kind of.
|
|
|
Post by Ironscarfs on Dec 19, 2008 6:46:02 GMT -5
Original was fantastic. It wasn't about special effects and explosions, more about the cold war really and the possibilty we might wipe ourselves out. I love fifties flying saucers too.
|
|
|
Post by Bittenbymonk on Dec 19, 2008 10:03:33 GMT -5
the new one is all about how humans are destorying the earth, so much so to the point where many would consider it too heavy with not a lot of action.... don't get me wrong there is a lot of sfx, but there's also a lot of the good stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Dec 21, 2008 15:34:46 GMT -5
Bittenbymonk |I can prove the new one is shit in four words- Keanu Reeves acting "WHOA!" YOu need to draw uper Dave kicking keanu reeves ass! if we need uper dave to rock any one to death it is him! "THE ORIGINAL OWNS!"
|
|
|
Post by Bittenbymonk on Dec 22, 2008 17:07:13 GMT -5
I should bear that in mind... he ruined that dracula movie.
|
|